If you want to switch advisors, here is detailed advice from
Showing posts with label financial advisors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label financial advisors. Show all posts
April 3, 2023
September 8, 2021
Thinking about hiring a financial advisor? Considering switching advisors?
Here are some links to articles to help you find such assistance. Thanks to Michelle Singletary, personal finance writer for The Washington Post.
What You Need to Know About Fee-Only Financial Advisors
Fee-Only Financial Planner vs. Fee-Based: What’s the Difference?
March 12, 2019
Maybe your financial "adviser" has been taking advantage of you
"The Securities and Exchange Commission's program to persuade investment
firms to self-report conflicts of interest has led to a settlement under
which 79 firms return $125 million in fees to clients. The firms placed
clients in share classes with expenses higher
than those in other share classes available without disclosing that
fact." (Retirement Security SmartBrief)
"Advisers to Repay Fund Investors" by Dave Michaels in The Wall Street Journal (3/12/19) states that 79 investment advisory firms have agreed to pay $125 million to clients thwo were over charged for their investments.
If you are not familiar with the term "fiduciary" then it's time to search this blog and educate yourself.
These "advisers" sold high cost mutual funds to their clients in order to boost their own earnings or qualify them for earning prizes like vehicles and trips. These practices have been around for as long as the industry has been selling financial products. Equally suitable lower cost funds were available for these clients who ended up earning less on their investments due to the difference in fund costs.
Top of the list is Wells Fargo, the "king" of egregious consumer practices. Why does anyone still do business with Wells Fargo? Deutsche Bank is also involved in this settlement.
"Advisers to Repay Fund Investors" by Dave Michaels in The Wall Street Journal (3/12/19) states that 79 investment advisory firms have agreed to pay $125 million to clients thwo were over charged for their investments.
If you are not familiar with the term "fiduciary" then it's time to search this blog and educate yourself.
These "advisers" sold high cost mutual funds to their clients in order to boost their own earnings or qualify them for earning prizes like vehicles and trips. These practices have been around for as long as the industry has been selling financial products. Equally suitable lower cost funds were available for these clients who ended up earning less on their investments due to the difference in fund costs.
Top of the list is Wells Fargo, the "king" of egregious consumer practices. Why does anyone still do business with Wells Fargo? Deutsche Bank is also involved in this settlement.
January 31, 2019
So you think you're a good judge of financial advice?
The vast majority of financial advisers do not take advantage of their clients. BUT... "About 7 percent of U.S. advisers have misconduct records in civil or regulatory proceedings." And previous studies have shown it is easy to cover up these bad records.
Squared Away Blog's author Kim Blanton explains the study:
"A new study finds that various things can trip people up and make them trust an adviser who is giving out bad advice. These influences included a good first impression of the adviser. And one way for an adviser to make a good first impression is by initially confirming the client’s own views on investing before introducing poor advice."
Why give bad advice? Advisers who are not fiduciaries may have an incentive to recommend costly products that pay them a high commission or qualify them for bonuses or other incentives like trips to Hawaii.
"The subject of this study – judging the quality of financial advice – is important at a time workers are carrying a heavy load of responsibilities for managing their 401(k) accounts, and the accounts are becoming more critical to their retirement outlook."
Read the summary of the study and its conclusions at: https://squaredawayblog.bc.edu/squared-away/are-we-able-to-judge-financial-advisers/
And heed Kim's conclusion after reading the academic study: "Left to their own devices, the public’s financial acumen is generally poor, and a good adviser will steer them toward sound decisions. But this research indicates that investors can get into trouble if they aren’t able to detect when they’re getting bad advice."
So be skeptical, educate yourself (using this blog), and get a second opinion, just like you would before major surgery.
Squared Away Blog's author Kim Blanton explains the study:
"A new study finds that various things can trip people up and make them trust an adviser who is giving out bad advice. These influences included a good first impression of the adviser. And one way for an adviser to make a good first impression is by initially confirming the client’s own views on investing before introducing poor advice."
Why give bad advice? Advisers who are not fiduciaries may have an incentive to recommend costly products that pay them a high commission or qualify them for bonuses or other incentives like trips to Hawaii.
"The subject of this study – judging the quality of financial advice – is important at a time workers are carrying a heavy load of responsibilities for managing their 401(k) accounts, and the accounts are becoming more critical to their retirement outlook."
Read the summary of the study and its conclusions at: https://squaredawayblog.bc.edu/squared-away/are-we-able-to-judge-financial-advisers/
And heed Kim's conclusion after reading the academic study: "Left to their own devices, the public’s financial acumen is generally poor, and a good adviser will steer them toward sound decisions. But this research indicates that investors can get into trouble if they aren’t able to detect when they’re getting bad advice."
So be skeptical, educate yourself (using this blog), and get a second opinion, just like you would before major surgery.
March 11, 2016
Surprise -- There's a Good Chance Your Broker Is Ripping You Off
"Good financial professionals can help us grow our
nest eggs, save money on taxes, and plan effectively for the future. But
lousy ones can really hurt us -- and apparently there are a lot of them
out there." "It's reasonable to be intimidated by
the world of investing as, after all, few of us ever learned much about
it in school. Thus, it can seem as if a reasonable and safe thing to do
is to seek out professional guidance or to simply accept professional
advice that's offered. According to a recent study, though, it turns out
that's not such a safe move."The report, titled The Market for
Financial Misconduct "examined the records of more than a million
financial advisors and former financial advisors between 2005 and 2015
and learned that a shocking 7% of them -- 87,000 in total -- had been
disciplined for misconduct or fraud."
"Note that the 7% represents those that were misbehaving and discovered. The percentage of total misbehavers is likely significantly higher, as those who were never caught are not included in the 7%." Read more at: http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/03/09/surprise-theres-a-good-chance-your-broker-is-rippi.aspx
Labels:
financial adviser,
financial advisors
August 11, 2014
Questons to ask a financial adviser
- How long have you worked in
financial services and in what capacity?
- What is your academic
training–undergrad and grad school?
- Have you earned either your
CFA and/or CPA designations? or CFP (Certified Financial Planner)
- What kind of continuing
education are you engaging in to stay abreast of developments in your field?
- Do you work under a
suitability or fiduciary standard?
- Do you utilize an active or
passive/evidenced-based approach & why?
- What fees are your clients
charged–all in, from your fee down to embedded fees such as markups on fixed
income purchases to management fees on recommended funds?
- Who manages your money &
what debt do you carry personally?
Manisha Thakor (@ManishaThakor) is founder and chief
executive of Santa Fe, N.M.–based MoneyZen Wealth Management LLC.
Labels:
financial advice,
financial advisors
June 23, 2014
Brokers Fight Rule to Favor Best Interests of Customers
If you think your broker
or financial “advisor” has your best interests at heart, think again. “David
O’Brien, a certified financial planner, has tried to repair the retirement
portfolios of several victims over the years. There was the high school science
teacher who didn’t realize she had been sold a variable annuity, where layers
of incomprehensible fees devoured nearly 2.5 percent of her retirement savings
each year. Then there was the woman fighting cancer, who was also sold a
high-cost annuity, but whose underlying investments were tied up in a
money-market type fund — one that cost 1.5 percent annually.” “Brokers are not necessarily required to act
in their customers’ best interest, even if they are advising on their
retirement money. While that would seem to be a basic consumer protection, in
Washington and on Wall Street it has proved to be wildly contentious.” Don’t
deal with any financial professional who doesn’t have a fiduciary
responsibility to put your interests first. Tara Siegel Bernard explains the
details in the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/13/your-money/rule-to-make-brokers-act-in-clients-interest-still-pending-after-4-years.html?ref=your-money
Labels:
advisor ethics,
broker,
fiduciary,
financial advisors
June 5, 2014
You Probably Have No Idea What You Pay Your Financial Advisor In Fees
"Most people have an idea of what they’re being charged for a service,
but just like phone bills and bank account statements, there are plenty
of hidden or additional charges that go largely unnoticed and might be
affecting your bottom line. So as for your investment accounts... the only real way to know is to
investigate what’s inside…there may be some surprises." Learn more from Roger Gershman at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/rogergershman/2014/06/03/you-probably-have-no-idea-what-you-pay-your-financial-advisor-in-fees-heres-why/
Labels:
advisor ethics,
financial advisors,
fund fees,
investment fees
October 23, 2013
Why There's No Financial Advice for Most Americans
“America's middle class
needs a lot of help managing its finances. The financial industry isn't
providing much.”
“The latest failed experiment in
bringing affordable financial advice to the masses is online platform Nestwise.
The startup was shut down on Sept. 1, despite backing by the U.S.’s largest
independent broker-dealer, LPL Financial Holdings Inc.”
“In May 2012, then-LPL senior executive Esther Stearns, 53,
launched Nestwise; she left the company last month. Stearns, who says she can’t
discuss the decision to close Nestwise, agreed to talk about the lessons
learned from the startup and whether eventually there will be cost-effective
ways to get advice to those who arguably need it most.” Read the interview by Ben Steverman for Bloomberg
News at: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-10-22/why-theres-no-financial-advice-for-most-americans
Labels:
financial advice,
financial advisors,
middle class
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
