The term "fiduciary" has been in the news for past couple of years.
The Obama Administration proposed a rule that financial advisors who
deal with retirement must follow a fiduciary standard rather than a
"suitability" standard. A fiduciary must put the client's interests
ahead of her/his own (i.e., costs, commissions, etc.); previously most
advisors only had to recommend products that were "suitable" for the
client (but perhaps were more costly than other alternatives, thus
paying the advisor a higher commission and costing the consumer higher
fees and lower returns). The Trump administration has rolled back this
rule.
Therefore, it is essential that consumers ask their
advisor: "Are you a fiduciary? Are you putting my best interests ahead
of your financial gain?"
Read Peter Fisher's article:
Why Conflicting Retirement Advice Is Crushing American Households
In a 2015 report by
the Council of Economic Advisers, the authors estimate that “the
aggregate annual cost of conflicted advice is about $17 billion each
year.” This conflicting advice comes from individuals and institutions
that are "compensated through fees and commissions that depend on their
clients’ actions. Such fee structures generate acute conflicts of
interest." (full quote).
"Unfortunately for the American family seeking 'professional' financial
advice, the choices are few. Just a small percentage of financial
professionals are able to offer financial advice without facing the
conflicts outlined by the Council of Economic Advisers."
Very few are "fee-only advisers who follow a true
fiduciary standard that prohibits commissions on products recommended to
clients and legally requires the advisers to always put their clients’
interests first."
No comments:
Post a Comment